Obama holds court with Felipe Calderón over a joint session of Congress and permits him to berate Arizonans and the Americans who support the law dealing with illegal aliens (and no, they’re not “undocumented workers”).
As this editorial by John Lott points out:
President Obama keeps asserting that Americans risk being harassed because of the Arizona law. But he never explains how this could happen given what appears to be the extremely straightforward language in the law.
Wouldn’t Obama better serve the people of Arizona and the United States by reading the law? He can download it here or read a summary. He should also carefully study Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution (emphasis added):
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
Through this recent bill, Arizonans (as Virginian’s did with the Healthcare Freedom Act), are asserting the self-evident truths that:
“…they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”
The citizens of Arizona have simply empowered the state government to protect them from a foreign invasion where the federal government has failed miserably to do so.
For Obama, Arizona is yet another annoying and inconvenient reminder that there are limits on his power, that he serves at the consent of the governed and that the majority of Americans do not share his vision to remake America.
Last edited on May 21, 2010 at 6:06 pm
The tenth amendment appears to have had long reach with long claws and teeth all along – all it takes is and local sheriff, local prosecutor and state governor that will obey their sworn and statutory duties under our Constitutions. In such case even the POTUS is bound to see that the laws are faithfully executed short of the POTUS perpetrating insurrection (USConst.Art2S3c4).
NO one need be taken by surprise in this. We can all get along unless one of us chooses otherwise – otherwise the full weight of the law written within the hearts of 300 million or so people and all their ancestors must fall upon criminal conceit.
In that State Law, MUST bind the judgment of any federal court within its state in accord with the terms of 28USC453 on a Judge’s Oath , 28USC1652 on State Law as the Rule of Decision and Va19.2-265.2 & Va 8.01-386 “Judicial notice of laws” “A. Whenever ”. . .” it becomes necessary to ascertain what the law ”. . .” of this Commonwealth, ”. . .”, of the United States”. . .” the court shall take judicial notice thereof whether specially pleaded or not” such that FRE#302 and FRE#201 are modified so that federal judges are deemed to have taken notice of the laws by their profession license as officers of the courts such they may not lawfully plead ignorance of the law upon the perpetration of Va18.2-481(5) statutory treason and/or Va18.2-111 statutory embezzlement of the laws.
NO such criminally perpetrated ruling in either state or federal court is EVER FINAL in that it is a fraud upon the court.
Even a supreme court ruling against both federal and state Constitutions and duly authorized statutes is more than likely 18USC1341 “Frauds & Swindles” in the supreme court justices’ personal capacity only as the may only constitutionally hold their offices during good behavior (USCost.Art3s1).
State locality jurisdiction courts appear to have indictment and arrest duty upon ANY offending US supreme court justice (at least in all states bound by the like of Va1-248, VA§19.2-191 & USConst.Art.4)
If I have missed something important I would sure like to know.
link refs:
http://www.teapartynation.com/group/ConstitutionalTriage/forum/topics/us-constitution-discussion-3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000453—-000-.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001652—-000-.html
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+19.2-265.2
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+8.01-386
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule302
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule201
http://www.teapartynation.com/group/ConstitutionalTriage/forum/topics/us-constitution-discussion-4
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+1-248
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+19.2-191
http://www.teapartynation.com/group/ConstitutionalTriage/forum/topics/us-constitution-discussion-7