Perhaps we don’t need economy-wrecking EPA regulations and a massive global taxation scheme after all? People (like me) who are skeptical of global warming “science” are labeled “deniers”…but I think that people who continue to believe the hysteria should be called “blind-faithers”. Because faith is all that is driving their climate panic…its certainly not science.
The longer that they wait to admit their overheated forecasts were wrong, the more they are going to harm all of science.
Source: When Will Climate Scientists Say They Were Wrong? | Cato Institute
DIRECT OBSERVATIONS by simple regular people – such as my simple rural family in Virginia; I’ve lived in rural Shenandoah Valley for nearly 20 years, and lived in rural central Piedmont for more than 20 years – are that
1. human activities change local ecologies including local climates
2. that some the the changes have been beneficial and some have not
3. that the changes have COST us more money and made us LESS SECURE than otherwise because the changes are costly in many ways
4. attempts to DENY that these changes and ill effects are occurring is ignorant ( or what simple regular people are observing and experiencing), and unhelpful (for those simple regular people who are struggling to adapt while the ignorant deny the experiences, needs, and struggles of the simple regular people).
So, whatever you may say about these or those datasets, the simple, regular people are EXPERIENCING costly changes, costly to their livelihood, costly to their health, costly to our futures.
‘Climate change’ deniers appear to us as wacky eggheads or self-serving agents of corporate oligarchs who either want to make money off the status quo or to make money off the changes. In either case ‘Climate change deniers’ will only have credibility with simple regular people if they DENIAL and DOING NOTHING is less costly to us than DOING SOME THINGS.